in:Indian fine dining24 pts
“Tamarind is very mid - I expect well-made paneer at that price point, and it honestly tasted rubbery and packaged.”
H3
5.4/10Indian
AI-generated summary
People split hard on Tamarind. One side says the room is formal and the service is good, and the is the thing to get. The other side calls it overpriced and bland, upscale Indian that a cart does better for a fraction. If you go anyway, the common advice is the business lunch, where the price makes more sense.
“Tamarind is very mid - I expect well-made paneer at that price point, and it honestly tasted rubbery and packaged.”
H3
“I’ve been to Tamarind and it was just ok. They present themselves as fine dining, but it just feels like average Indian food in a dressed up dining room. It was well executed, but nothing out of the ordinary.”
H3
“this is a little high end, but really flavorful without too many gimmicks.”
H2
“Dated, tiny portions and stale flavours”
H2
“Second Tamarind, it fits your wants if your definition of affordable is around $80 per person without drinks.”
H2
“Indian accent is amazing and def better than tamarind you won’t regret it”
H2
“The difference between Tamarind and everywhere else I find is the consistency and high quality of food at Tamarind. Highly recommend.”
H2
“upscale Indian but caters to the work lunch crowd with great service and approachable prices”
H2
“Tamarind is better than Kebab aur Sharab, but not by much.”
H2
“Tamarind is overpriced, bland Northern Indian food made for white folks in their 60s that is only semi-worth it for their business lunch or Restaurant Week”
H2
“Skip Tamarind overhyped and over priced.”
H2
“Tamarind, Goa, and Paisley Nice atmosphere”
H2